Tuesday, March 28, 2017

What's the point? (hint: it's partially you)

Window poppies by Gary Rubin on 500px.com
Blogging - a window into the creative
process (sorry about the pun)
My wife recently asked me why I decided to blog, who my intended audience was, and what I hoped to get out of the blogging process.

Perhaps not surprising given my subject matter, my ultimate goal is to become a better photographer. So what does that have to do with this blog?

As I rediscover photography and try to wrap my mind around the complexities of digital photography, I end up with observations and half-formed ideas rolling around in the back of my mind.  The process of putting those thoughts on proverbial paper helps me solidify those vague ideas and start to turn observations into concepts.  In essence, blogging is (hopefully) a step in a process whereby observations are formed into problems (or ideas) that can be solved (or implemented) to try to improve my photography.

I've therefore addressed the "why", but careful readers will notice that I've skipped my wife's second question - who is my intended audience. As I just alluded to, I would probably get a lot of the same benefit if this was private journal instead of a blog.  So, why publish?  I'm doing this in hopes of starting a discussion and getting feedback.  I'm not pretending to state any hard facts, just presenting my own observations and thoughts.  I would love to have readers engage in the comment section - start a discussion about what I got right or wrong; tell me I'm full of it; add your two cents; etc.  I know a lot of my meanderings thus far have been a bit on the technical side, but I absolutely welcome feedback from photographers and non-photographers alike.


Monday, March 20, 2017

Black and White in the Digital Age

I began to seriously get into photography via black-and-white film in the 1990s.  I got to know the look and feel of various types of film and photo paper, such as Pan-X vs. Tri-X and Gloss vs. Matte.

Adobe Lightroom B&W Sliders
Now that I'm working in the digital realm, I shoot color RAW and convert to black and white in post-processing. I very much enjoy the control that Adobe Lightroom provides over the color-to-B&W conversion.  In addition to being able to control the contributions of various color regions, I appreciate the brightness curves and sliders that let me separately control the various shades of grey.

Despite (or maybe because of) this level of control, I've had trouble achieving on displays the look that I was used to with film and paper. I attribute this primarily to the variability of display brightness and the contrast ratios of LED displays - as the brightness is changed, the white level obviously changes.  How such changes affect other display properties can be calibrated using an external feedback device such as a ColorMunki.  I guess the old-school analogy is looking at a black-and-white print in a variety of lighting conditions, from a dimly-lit room to full sunshine.

Regardless of the cause, I've found that the variability in black-and-white tonality across multiple displays makes it difficult to find the "right" look.  This makes me wonder whether the prevalence of digital displays has affected what makes a "good" black and white image.  I see a lot of low-key images and wonder if the exaggerated blacks and in-your-face contrast works best with today's screens.

So, do digital displays favor higher-contrast images or are they just easier to work with in a display medium that doesn't do subtlety?  My tastes certainly seem to run toward more extreme contrast; I find that I'm happiest with my B&W when I set it the way I think it should be, then push the contrast even further.




Observatory by Gary Rubin on 500px.com
Griffith Observatory, Los Angeles, CA

Satellites by Gary Rubin on 500px.com
Early Satellite models at Smithsonian Udvar-Hazy Center


Iwo Jima by Gary Rubin on 500px.com
Iwo Jima Memorial

Saturday, March 18, 2017

Hardware and Software

Discussing equipment seems like a requirement for a photography blog, so I might as well get that out of the way.

Current equipment:

    Trees by Gary Rubin on 500px.com
  • Nikon D5200 APS-C (crop sensor)
  • 80-200mm f/2.8 (20-year-old used lens)
  • 28-75mm f/2.8
  • 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6
  • 10-20mm f/4.5-5.6
Almost all of the equipment was purchased used and/or refurbished from B&H.

I use a monopod with the 80-200mm.  It' a heavy lens and has no stability correction, so is pretty unforgiving when it comes to handheld shots.

For software, I use Adobe Lightroom CC.  I have the Google Nik plugins installed, but haven't used them enough to really have a good feel for what they do.  
I'd like to learn Photoshop, but am intimidated by what looks like an incredibly-steep learning curve.


What's in a Name?

I forgot my blog URL (a little embarrassing, but understandable since I've only had it for about 12 hours), so I tried googling "Opportunistic Photographer blog".  What I found was that there have been at least two other blogs with similar names.  I also noticed that these were very short-lived blogs. This is not surprising, as a lack of dedicated time is what leads to "opportunistic photography" and is also detrimental to blogging.

I hope that my effort lasts longer than a month and isn't as fleeting as the rabbit in the picture below (that was my first attempt at embedded a picture from my 500px page)


Peter Rabbit by Gary Rubin on 500px.com

Friday, March 17, 2017

What kind of photographer am I?

The two types of photographers

Yaquina Bay Bridge, Newport, OR
I once heard a professional photographer opine that there are two types of photographers - those who approach the art from the creative side, and those who approach it from the technical side.   She was quick to point out that a photographer could be strong in both areas, of course.  For some people, she said, composition and ideas come naturally while figuring out how to turn the idea into reality takes a lot more effort.  Other photographers, on the other hand, think in terms of how light is captured and the effect that shutter speed, aperture, ISO, etc. will have on the final image. For them, the harder part is the composition.

That photographer, as someone who had formal training in graphic design, put herself solidly in the former category.  I would definitely be in the latter.  As a trained scientist, I have learned enough optics (mostly forgotten by now) to have a pretty good understanding of how light interacts with world and how the camera captures that light.  The hard part for me is to develop and continue to strengthen the photographer's eye.  To look around and see my surroundings as potential shots.  To realize that if I took three steps to the left, my foreground and background would line up much better.

That's not to say that my technique is perfect - far from it.  I still have a lot to learn and, as someone who started in film photography, I need to remind myself that I can look at a shot I just took, evaluate, change things, and reshoot.  I also have to overcome the bad habits created by a decade or so of using digital point-and-shoots.  The technical aspects are not yet second nature, but they also aren't something that I have to work hard to understand.

Composition, on the other hand, does take considerable conscious effort.  Not only do I need to make myself think about framing, perspective, etc., but I also need to figure out color.  I started with black and white film photography about 25 years ago and I still tend to think like I'm shooting black and white.  Textures catch my eye, but I'm still trying to figure out that extra content that color provides.


Getting Started

Welcome, and thank you for stopping by.

Why "The Opportunistic Photographer"? 
I have three kids with lots of year-round activities, so my schedule revolves around theirs.  On top of that, neither my wife nor I is very good at saying "no" to requests for volunteers, so we also wind up involved in their activities.  What does this have to do with the name of this blog?  It means that I shoot when I can, usually with little opportunity for planning, composition, or dawdling. It also means that I do a fair bit of shooting at their events - martial arts competitions, wrestling meets, swim meets, softball and baseball games, etc.

On those weekends when we don't have events going on, I still tend to shoot opportunistically.  I don't want to drag the family along on a photography outing, nor do I want to keep them waiting while I look for the perfect angle, perspective, or lighting.

What will I find here?
I decided to start this blog to provide myself with a place to ponder photography, share my images, and hopefully get some useful feedback from other photographers and photography fans.

Please feel free to look around. I'd appreciate hearing your thoughts, as well as any constructive criticism of what you see here.

As with my photography outings, I expect my blogging will be sporadic, so if you see a month or two go by without an update, please be patient and check back again later.

Thanks!
Gary